All new registrations must send an email to weygold@paganlibrary.com. This is due to the overwhelming number of spam accounts being created and is the only way I can tell which ones are human and which are bots. No account will be apporoved unless an email is received.






anywho i was talking to some people the other day and i just have one question on this war. why does president bush expect Iraq to get rid of its nuclear weapons when we ourselves probably have more. i mean put yourself in their position, if you had a country like the US threatening to bomb you would you get rid of your defense and just sit there like a sitting duck? is it really ok for us to have nuclear weapons in the first place? if one country has the right to have nuclear weapons to feel safe doesnt that give every other country the right to have them so they to feel safe?


Wbdsgnr1 wrote:MoonBaby--
Hes just a really really bad leader and for some reason President Bush sees it as his duty to free the people of Iraq. My only two problems with that is #1 its not really his duty #2 the people don't want to be saved. Saddam is 65 years old, he has been in power over there since 1979. People dont know any other way of life except to follow saddam.
put people into meat grinders alive, acid alive.
Saddam is another hitler people, he used his own country as a concentration camp and tested his exparimental chemical weapons on his own people.
Even if you didn't know anything else, I'm sure you could know if something was wrong or right.
All he cares about are money (oil), power, wealth, prestige, and privilege, all HIS, no-one else's. The threat of biological warfare makes us (Canadians) just as scared as those of you who live in the States. I do not support this war because innocent Iraqui people are the ones who will continue to suffer the most, but I do wish someone had taken Saddam out of the picture long ago!
And then there's the "Freedom" Fries crap! It scares me to see what lengths some people will go to. What's next?
But this rite of passage for this boy will enable him to be eligible to be trained to fight, to kill, the hated infidels, the Westerners (I know, "Americans"), the Jews, etc. At what point in this war does the international community's freedom to choose to go to war, or not, matter any more, if the US president can just go ahead and do his own thing? Doesn't that make him a dictator of sorts, too?

Wbdsgnr1 wrote:Crone--
This is a little off the subject but I read an article that in Ethiopia or some country like that, girls genitals get cut at a certain age.
or female circumcision, and is prevalent in many African nations, as well as in India. The girls are often as young as 8 when it happens, so it is NOT because they are then "ready for marriage"
In many instances, in small villages, etc., NO ANESTHESIA IS USED.
It is all about male domination over female sexuality; it removes the "pleasure centre" so that women can never feel sexually pleasure, just the men!!
The women have been so dominated by patriarchal males that they believe the practice to be "healthy" and "in the girl's best interests" because they themselves were mutilated in this way, and because the women are the ones who actually perform this heinous act {unless they live in a city where a male doctor makes a fortune doing this} it's the only way they can rationalize what happened to them as being a part of their culture!

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests