I do not know how that would work or if it is even possible.
A big part of who we are as a people or individuals depends greatly upon our social and economic factors.
My friend Nick always says that, "People with scruples are the people who can afford to have scruples."
I somewhat feel that taking away these barriers is unethical.
Actually here is a relevant story that actually happened today:
There is a regular customer that comes into my work. I have politely chit-chatted with this woman on several occasions. She is, in my book, a decent person. Many would not give her a try because she is kind of hippy-like and has tats. I have allowed this person to take hand-fulls of our creamers because I knew she could not afford to buy it on her own. She does get government assistance and is a mother of two children.
This woman has always been sympathetic to the clerks and will defend us if another customer is being rude to us.
Today she drove off with $18.00 of gasoline. My coworker, Seth, authorized her pump and did not call out simply because she was a regular. When she came in to pay both clerks were preoccupied with fixing something in the store. She saw that they were distracted and took the chance to drive off.
If she knew that this would actually hurt the clerks, would she still have opted to drive off? If she knew that the other clerks would tell me and that I would remember where she lived, would she still drive off?
Bb
Lotus
I have not been the same since that house fell on my sister.